Evidence of prior income required to reduce child support

A parent who asks the court to reduce or increase a monthly child support obligation is required to provide evidence of his or her income at the time of the prior order and at the time of trial.

The Houston First Court of Appeals said this in the case of In re D.H., No. 01-19-00268-CV (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist.] 7/28/2020, no pet.)(mem. op.):

“To determine whether there has been a substantial and material change, the court must compare the financial circumstances of the child and the affected parties at the time the order was entered with their financial circumstances at the time the modification is sought.” As the party seeking to modify the child-support order, Father had “the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a material and substantial change in circumstances [had] occurred,” by presenting evidence of historical and current financial circumstances.

(citations omitted)

This case cited In re C.C.J., 244 S.W.3d 911, 917-18 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.) that said,”The record must contain both historical and current evidence of the relevant person’s financial circumstances. Without both sets of data, the court has nothing to compare and cannot determine whether a material and substantial change has occurred.”

So, the hypothetical father who, in 2026, wants to reduce his child support obligation set forth in a 2022 court order must produce evidence of his income in 2022 and in 2026. Evidence might include his income tax returns for 2021 (the last full year before his child support was calculated in 2022), 2022 and 2025 as well as his paystubs from 2026 showing his year-to-date pay. His social security earning statement showing his earnings each year might also be helpful.

New Family Law Legislation 2025: Part 1 – Protective Orders May Last Longer

That two year domestic violence protective order may last longer than two years if the respondent has a pending divorce, suit affecting the parent-child relationship, or criminal case arising from the family violence.  The 2025 Legislature amended Tex. Family Code Sec. 85.025 to say that a protective order is effective until the second anniversary of: […]

Reimbursement: Proving Enhancement of Value

The case of In re Marriage of McCoy & Els, 488 S.W.3d 430, 435 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, no pet.) applied the pre-2023 reimbursement law but it is still probably applicable because both the old and new reimbursement statutes apply an “enhancement of value” measure to claims arising from improvements.  The court in this case […]

Pleadings Required for Waste Claim (which is NOT a reimbursement claim)

An October 2024 opinion says that a waste claim is not a reimbursement claim and holds that pleadings are required to recover on a waste claim. The court in Mohammed v. Mohammed, No. 02-23-00449-CV (Tex. App. – Fort Worth, 10/10/2024)(mem. op.) stated: From a procedural standpoint, it is axiomatic that “a judgment must be supported […]

Error to Include 8% Closing Costs if House Will Not Be Sold

An October 2024 opinion held that it was error to reduce the value of a community property house by 8% in the trial court’s property division calculation when the house was not going to be sold. The court in Sloan v. Sloan, No. 02-23-00361-CV (Tex. App. – Fort Worth 10/17/2024)(mem. op.) held: In the trial […]

Maximum Child Support Increases September 1, 2025

The maximum amount of child support in Texas usually calculated in most cases will increase on September 1, 2025 to: 1 child                  $2,340 2 children           $2,925 3 children            $3,510 4 children            $4,095 The Texas Attorney General announced in the Texas Register on August 15, 2025 (Vol 50, no. 33)” “Effective September 1, 2025, the guidelines for […]

What  Do the Terms “Personal Property” and “Personal Effects” Mean in Texas?

Court orders often use terms such as “personal property” and “personal effects.”  These phrases have specific meanings in Texas. Personal Property In re Estate of Hunt, 597 S.W.3d 912, 916 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, no pet.) held that “Personal property” has a well-established technical legal meaning and  “encompasses everything other than real property.” Real […]